This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
fuel_opnfv_governance [2015/10/04 18:24] Jonas Bjurel [Fuel@OPNFV Project lead] |
fuel_opnfv_governance [2015/10/04 18:26] Jonas Bjurel [Fuel@OPNFV rules of arbitration] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=====Fuel@OPNFV rules of arbitration===== | =====Fuel@OPNFV rules of arbitration===== | ||
- | Although Fuel@OPNFV is an Open-source project with the lead-star of Meritocracy, the expectation of the project lead is that together with the project committers - steer the project into sound future prospects, keeping project and architectural goals in mind. A well respected OPNFV@Fuel project lead should under normal conditions be able to do that by finding consensus - only in extraordinary cases should formal voting be used. | + | Although Fuel@OPNFV is an Open-source project with the lead-star of Meritocracy, the expectation of the project lead is that, in consensus with the project committers - steer the project into sound future prospects, keeping project and architectural goals in mind. A well respected OPNFV@Fuel project lead should under normal conditions be able to do that by finding consensus - only in extraordinary cases should formal voting be used. |
- | Formal voting on decisions can be requested if a majority of the project commiters request this. In this case, only committers are eligible to vote, and the result should follow the majority vote outcome. | + | Formal voting on decisions can be requested if an absolute majority of the project committers request this. In this case, only committers are eligible to vote, and the result should follow the single majority vote outcome. |