User Tools

Site Tools


fuel_opnfv_governance

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
fuel_opnfv_governance [2015/10/04 18:24]
Jonas Bjurel [Fuel@OPNFV Project lead]
fuel_opnfv_governance [2015/10/04 18:26]
Jonas Bjurel [Fuel@OPNFV rules of arbitration]
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 =====Fuel@OPNFV rules of arbitration===== =====Fuel@OPNFV rules of arbitration=====
-Although Fuel@OPNFV is an Open-source project with the lead-star of Meritocracy,​ the expectation of the project lead is that together ​with the project committers - steer the project into sound future prospects, keeping project and architectural goals in mind. A well respected OPNFV@Fuel project lead should under normal conditions be able to do that by finding consensus - only in extraordinary cases should formal voting be used.+Although Fuel@OPNFV is an Open-source project with the lead-star of Meritocracy,​ the expectation of the project lead is that, in consensus ​with the project committers - steer the project into sound future prospects, keeping project and architectural goals in mind. A well respected OPNFV@Fuel project lead should under normal conditions be able to do that by finding consensus - only in extraordinary cases should formal voting be used.
  
-Formal voting on decisions can be requested if majority of the project ​commiters ​request this. In this case, only committers are eligible to vote, and the result should follow the majority vote outcome.+Formal voting on decisions can be requested if an absolute ​majority of the project ​committers ​request this. In this case, only committers are eligible to vote, and the result should follow the single ​majority vote outcome.
  
fuel_opnfv_governance.txt ยท Last modified: 2015/10/04 19:46 by Jonas Bjurel