This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
release_c_planning:priority_list [2016/03/08 23:47] Raghuveer Reddy |
release_c_planning:priority_list [2016/03/15 19:47] (current) Al Morton [Table] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| Yardstick Sucessful run with clean results | Successful completion with reported results. | High | XL | High | | | | | Yardstick Sucessful run with clean results | Successful completion with reported results. | High | XL | High | | | | ||
| Apex Consume ovs4opnfv generated RPM | Define Deployment options for DPDK and non-DPDK. | | | | | Work with Apex for successful integration (TFH) | | | Apex Consume ovs4opnfv generated RPM | Define Deployment options for DPDK and non-DPDK. | | | | | Work with Apex for successful integration (TFH) | | ||
+ | | NSH for vxLan | NSH/vLAN available for DPDK and non-DPDK. | High | XL | High | | Integrate and Test | | ||
---- | ---- | ||
- | ^ Feature | Description ^ Priority | Effort | Impact | Jira | Comments | | + | ^ Feature | Description ^ Priority | Effort | Impact | Jira | Comments | |
- | | ** OVS Feature List** | | | | | | | | + | | ** OVS Feature List** | | | | | | | |
- | | OVS Performance (Requested by Bin, Hu) | need to set expectations based on Use Cases | High | | | | follow up meeting to be scheduled( 1 hour session) | | + | | OVS Performance (Requested by Bin, Hu) | need to set expectations based on Use Cases | High | | | | follow up meeting to be scheduled( 1 hour session) | |
- | | Priority Path through OVS | scheduling priority packets before others, OVS may not be the right place for it | High | | | | follow up meeting to be scheduled( 1 hour session) | | + | | Priority Path through OVS | scheduling priority packets before others. Dataplane Approaches include NIC queues, multi-queue at guest interface, and multiple guest interfaces. Control plane approach involves Auxiliary control connections to OF controller. | High | | | | follow up meeting at Hackfest (March) produces current list of alternatives. | |
- | | NSH Requirement | Happening independent of us, we need to ensure its reflected in OPNFV | Low | | | | | | + | | NSH Requirement | Happening independent of us, we need to ensure its reflected in OPNFV | Low | | | | | |
- | | MPLS over GRE | Specific requirement brought up by Ericsson but is being worked on by someone else, need to get link to it |Low | | | | | | + | | MPLS over GRE | Specific requirement brought up by Ericsson but is being worked on by someone else, need to get link to it | Low | | | | | |
- | | 100G Requirement | | | | | | | | + | | 100G Requirement | | | | | | | |
- | | Virtio Container requirement | | | | | | | | + | | Virtio Container requirement | | | | | | | |
- | | Port Placement on Cores | | | | | | | | + | | Port Placement on Cores | | | | | | | |