release_c_planning:priority_list
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
release_c_planning:priority_list [2016/03/07 17:50] Thomas F Herbert [Table] |
release_c_planning:priority_list [2016/03/15 19:47] (current) Al Morton [Table] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| | Yardstick Sucessful run with clean results | Successful completion with reported results. | High | XL | High | | | | | Yardstick Sucessful run with clean results | Successful completion with reported results. | High | XL | High | | | | ||
| | Apex Consume ovs4opnfv generated RPM | Define Deployment options for DPDK and non-DPDK. | | | | | Work with Apex for successful integration (TFH) | | | Apex Consume ovs4opnfv generated RPM | Define Deployment options for DPDK and non-DPDK. | | | | | Work with Apex for successful integration (TFH) | | ||
| + | | NSH for vxLan | NSH/vLAN available for DPDK and non-DPDK. | High | XL | High | | Integrate and Test | | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^ Feature | Description ^ Priority | Effort | Impact | Jira | Comments | | ||
| + | | ** OVS Feature List** | | | | | | | | ||
| + | | OVS Performance (Requested by Bin, Hu) | need to set expectations based on Use Cases | High | | | | follow up meeting to be scheduled( 1 hour session) | | ||
| + | | Priority Path through OVS | scheduling priority packets before others. Dataplane Approaches include NIC queues, multi-queue at guest interface, and multiple guest interfaces. Control plane approach involves Auxiliary control connections to OF controller. | High | | | | follow up meeting at Hackfest (March) produces current list of alternatives. | | ||
| + | | NSH Requirement | Happening independent of us, we need to ensure its reflected in OPNFV | Low | | | | | | ||
| + | | MPLS over GRE | Specific requirement brought up by Ericsson but is being worked on by someone else, need to get link to it | Low | | | | | | ||
| + | | 100G Requirement | | | | | | | | ||
| + | | Virtio Container requirement | | | | | | | | ||
| + | | Port Placement on Cores | | | | | | | | ||
| Line 40: | Line 54: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | ^ Feature | Description ^ Priority | Effort | Impact | Jira | Comments | | + | ^ Feature ^ Description | Priority | Effort | Impact | Jira | Comments | |
| - | | ** OVS Feature List** | | | | | | | | + | | **JOID Feature List** | | | | | | | |
| - | | OVS Performance (Requested by Bin, Hu) | need to set expectations based on Use Cases | High | | | | follow up meeting to be scheduled( 1 hour session) | | + | | Functest successful run with results | Successful completion with reported results. | High | XL | High | | | |
| - | | Priority Path through OVS | scheduling priority packets before others, OVS may not be the right place for it | High | | | | follow up meeting to be scheduled( 1 hour session) | | + | | Yardstick Successful run with results | Successful completion with reported results. | High | XL | High | | | |
| - | | NSH Requirement | Happening independent of us, we need to ensure its reflected in OPNFV | Low | | | | | | + | | JOID support with DPDK | Define Deployment options for DPDK | | | | | Work with JOID to integreted DPDK | |
| - | | MPLS over GRE | Specific requirement brought up by Ericsson but is being worked on by someone else, need to get link to it |Low | | | | | | + | | Support for Power8 architecture | Define Deployment options for different architecture | | | | | Work with JOID to integreted power8 architecture. | |
| - | | 100G Requirement | | | | | | | | + | |
| - | | Virtio Container requirement | | | | | | | | + | |
| - | | Port Placement on Cores | | | | | | | | + | |
release_c_planning/priority_list.1457373001.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/03/07 17:50 by Thomas F Herbert
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
