releases:brahmaputra:release_plan:bottlenecks_milestone_e_report
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
releases:brahmaputra:release_plan:bottlenecks_milestone_e_report [2015/12/17 20:53] Debra Scott created |
releases:brahmaputra:release_plan:bottlenecks_milestone_e_report [2016/01/06 06:15] (current) hongbo tian |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| 1. Has your test framework been executed against a deployed OPNFV platform? | 1. Has your test framework been executed against a deployed OPNFV platform? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes. Successfully tested on Fuel. Would be tested on Compass in the coming weeks. | ||
| 2. Has your deploy tool been executed in more than one Pharos lab? | 2. Has your deploy tool been executed in more than one Pharos lab? | ||
| + | |||
| + | No. Have only tested on LF Pod. Soon will be testing on Huawei lab in Santa Clara. | ||
| 3. Have your test framework and test cases been run against more than one deployment tool? | 3. Have your test framework and test cases been run against more than one deployment tool? | ||
| + | |||
| + | No. Have only tested on Fuel. But running against Compass will be in the coming weeks. | ||
| 4. Do you have all target Brahmaputra test cases available in your test suites? | 4. Do you have all target Brahmaputra test cases available in your test suites? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes. The test cases for B release has already available. | ||
| 5. Is your test framework able to be repeated on the same infrastructure at least 4 consecutive times without failures? Does it meet the agreed upon criteria of "stable"? | 5. Is your test framework able to be repeated on the same infrastructure at least 4 consecutive times without failures? Does it meet the agreed upon criteria of "stable"? | ||
| + | |||
| + | yes | ||
| 6. Have all known test issues (Jira tickets against your project) been documented and that documentation either integrated into the release or made available on a public page and pointed to through documents that are integrated into the release? | 6. Have all known test issues (Jira tickets against your project) been documented and that documentation either integrated into the release or made available on a public page and pointed to through documents that are integrated into the release? | ||
| + | |||
| + | still open. The documentation about the test suites will be integrated into the release. | ||
| 7. Are all known issues (Jira Tickets) prioritized by severity of impact (critical, high, medium, low) to users? | 7. Are all known issues (Jira Tickets) prioritized by severity of impact (critical, high, medium, low) to users? | ||
| + | |||
| + | The prioritization of Jira tickets will be discussed in the latest weekly meeting. | ||
| 8. Do all known critical Jira Tickets have a workaround in place? | 8. Do all known critical Jira Tickets have a workaround in place? | ||
| + | |||
| + | yes | ||
| 9. Do all non-critical Jira Tickets have a planned disposition in place (ie. deferred-fix in later release or closed- won't fix)? | 9. Do all non-critical Jira Tickets have a planned disposition in place (ie. deferred-fix in later release or closed- won't fix)? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Most of the critical Jira tickets have already resolved. The priority of Jira about testing on Compass will be raised. | ||
| 10. Is your documentation complete and checked in? If not, how do you plan to deliver it independent of the release? | 10. Is your documentation complete and checked in? If not, how do you plan to deliver it independent of the release? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Documentation is initialed and would be finished in 2~3 weeks. | ||
| + | |||
releases/brahmaputra/release_plan/bottlenecks_milestone_e_report.1450385621.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2015/12/17 20:53 by Debra Scott
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
