User Tools

Site Tools


releases:brahmaputra:release_plan:functest_milestone_e_report

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
releases:brahmaputra:release_plan:functest_milestone_e_report [2015/12/17 18:31]
Debra Scott created
releases:brahmaputra:release_plan:functest_milestone_e_report [2016/01/07 14:28] (current)
Jose Lausuch
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 1. Has your test framework been executed against a deployed OPNFV platform? 1. Has your test framework been executed against a deployed OPNFV platform?
 +  * successfully tested on fuel/no controller ​
 +  * partly tested on compass/no controller
 +  * partly tested on joid/odl
 +  * first test on apex/odl
 +
 +ref: [[https://​build.opnfv.org/​ci/​view/​functest/​| Functest jenkins page]]
  
 2. Has your deploy tool been executed in more than one Pharos lab? 2. Has your deploy tool been executed in more than one Pharos lab?
 +
 +  * yes
  
 3. Have your test framework and test cases been run against more than one deployment tool? 3. Have your test framework and test cases been run against more than one deployment tool?
 +
 +  * yes
  
 4. Do you have all target Brahmaputra test cases available in your test suites? 4. Do you have all target Brahmaputra test cases available in your test suites?
 +
 +  * no (internal testcase OK with doubt on capability to extend odl suite), onos and opencontrail test suites not tested yet (no target solution available), no news from other feature tests
 +
  
 5. Is your test framework able to be repeated on the same infrastructure at least 4 consecutive times without failures? Does it meet the agreed upon criteria of "​stable"?​ 5. Is your test framework able to be repeated on the same infrastructure at least 4 consecutive times without failures? Does it meet the agreed upon criteria of "​stable"?​
 +
 +  * achieved only once on fuel/no controller (wich is not the target)
 +  * no on all the other targets
  
 6. Have all known test issues (Jira tickets against your project) been documented and that documentation either integrated into the release or made available on a public page and pointed to through documents that //are// integrated into the release? 6. Have all known test issues (Jira tickets against your project) been documented and that documentation either integrated into the release or made available on a public page and pointed to through documents that //are// integrated into the release?
 +
 +  * JIRA for integration still open
 +  * JIRA for feature project integration ready for Sprint 4
 +  * Additional JIRAs linked to troubleshooting to be planned (for the moment mainly due to mis configuration (e.g. no external network))
  
 7. Are all known issues (Jira Tickets) prioritized by severity of impact (critical, high, medium, low) to users? ​ 7. Are all known issues (Jira Tickets) prioritized by severity of impact (critical, high, medium, low) to users? ​
 +
 +  * Integration JIRA are the top priority now, prioritization will be discussed before E milestone
  
 8. Do all known critical Jira Tickets have a workaround in place? 8. Do all known critical Jira Tickets have a workaround in place?
 +
 +  * not really if no target lab, no test..I do not see any possible workaround for that
  
 9. Do all non-critical Jira Tickets have a planned disposition in place (ie. deferred-fix in later release or closed- won't fix)? 9. Do all non-critical Jira Tickets have a planned disposition in place (ie. deferred-fix in later release or closed- won't fix)?
 +
 +  * not yet
  
 10. Is your documentation complete and checked in? If not, how do you plan to deliver it independent of the release? 10. Is your documentation complete and checked in? If not, how do you plan to deliver it independent of the release?
 +
 +  * doc initiated but work on documentation planned from week 2-3
releases/brahmaputra/release_plan/functest_milestone_e_report.1450377115.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2015/12/17 18:31 by Debra Scott