User Tools

Site Tools


requirements_projects

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
requirements_projects [2015/08/11 06:54]
Ildiko Vancsa [Project lifecycle]
requirements_projects [2015/08/11 13:53] (current)
Ildiko Vancsa [Project lifecycle]
Line 31: Line 31:
 ==== Project lifecycle ==== ==== Project lifecycle ====
  
-High level project lifecycle for the current categories:+High level (sub-)project lifecycle for the current categories:
  
 {{  :​requirements_projects:​project_lifecycle_doc_image.png?​600 ​ |}} {{  :​requirements_projects:​project_lifecycle_doc_image.png?​600 ​ |}}
  
-As you can see on the above figure the steps for each current category are the same, on high level the above mentioned categorization does not add any differentiation.+As you can see on the above figure the steps for each current category are the same, on high level the above mentioned categorization does not add any differentiation ​in the meaning of how we are using these terms. On the other hand today we are not following the process of having sub-projects for the different types of activities, but we are more aiming for covering all these under the umbrella of one single project.
  
 The categorization does not define anything about the lifecycle of the projects contained by each group either. In case of each and every project we have phases as: The categorization does not define anything about the lifecycle of the projects contained by each group either. In case of each and every project we have phases as:
Line 52: Line 52:
 Requirements can target deployment, testing of the platform or gaps in upstream projects. It is the responsibility of the project to cover the implementation,​ testing and documentation in the appropriate repository (repositories). Requirements can target deployment, testing of the platform or gaps in upstream projects. It is the responsibility of the project to cover the implementation,​ testing and documentation in the appropriate repository (repositories).
  
-By removing categorization we would like to encourage projects to follow the Agile flow. Having only generic projects we also remove the need of an additional administration step, which was required for Requirements Projects to move into the Collaborative Development category. ​The lifecycle of projects in each release looks like the follwoing:+By removing categorization we would like to encourage projects to follow the Agile flow. Having only generic projects we also remove the need of an additional administration step, which was required for Requirements Projects to move into the Collaborative Development category.
  
-{{  ​:requirements_projects:​project_lifecycle.jpeg?​600 ​ |}}+The lifecycle process without categories looks like the following:
  
-We haven'​t followed the lifecycle process depicted on the above figure during the Arno release. It is still an open question of how to handle these stages currently identified for a project and also whether we need all the steps.+{{  :​requirements_projects:​project_lifecycle.jpeg?​900 ​ |}}
  
-    * Is this process ​defined per release ​or per project as multiple release effort? +We haven'​t followed the lifecycle ​process ​depicted on the above figure during the Arno release. It is still an open question of how to handle these stages currently identified for project and also whether we need all the steps. It is also a question whether ​we should ​aim more for a Big Tent-like structure rather than strict review processes.
-      * Can/​should ​the stages be connected to milestones?​ +
-    * Should ​we aim more for a Big Tent-like structure rather than strict review processes?+
 ===== Requirements Projects ===== ===== Requirements Projects =====
  
requirements_projects.1439276056.txt.gz · Last modified: 2015/08/11 06:54 by Ildiko Vancsa