User Tools

Site Tools


retropectives:arno

This is an old revision of the document!


Arno Retrospective

Positives

  • Cross team/project collaboration
    • The community members should continue to contribute across different projects. If there are dependencies across projects a contribution to overcome them is the best way to keep moving forward.
    • Willingness to help on-board new members (e.g. on IRC)
  • Great leadership from the Functest project team who had to step forward in the past few months and manage the transition.
  • Engagement with upstream communities (e.g. impact recently at the OpenStack Summit)
  • Good visibility of Arno on social channels

Community

  • Burden on a small number of SMEs as was also highlighted in other email threads
  • Should be more clear on the areas where we need resources will help our members and the broader community find the right people to have involved
  • Discussed more resource needed for
    • ODL SME
      • Maybe OSGI/Karaf people to help with platform issues you see on ODL or ONOS
    • People who are in telco operations who are actively deploying applications today and can provide feedback
    • Testing competencies, with broad experience in testing for application deployment scenarios
    • Collaboration with SDOs
  • More resource on training and on-boarding is needed (both for new developers & users)
    • Better project information/dashboard will be helpful for people that are new to the project

Project Management

  • Scope management
    • Within 2 months of project launch, there was a relatively clear idea of the Arno scope. This reduction in scope was a contributing factor in being able to deliver.
    • The communication of the Arno scope after the decision was made could have been better
    • There was not an change management process for decision making during Arno and better communication could have reduced friction

MeetBot Minutes

retropectives/arno.1434231075.txt.gz · Last modified: 2015/06/13 21:31 by Ray Paik