User Tools

Site Tools


wiki:tc_minutes_20150528

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

wiki:tc_minutes_20150528 [2015/05/28 23:32]
Bin Hu created
wiki:tc_minutes_20150528 [2015/05/28 23:56] (current)
Bin Hu
Line 25: Line 25:
   * Upstream Feature Development and Cross-Project Collaboration   * Upstream Feature Development and Cross-Project Collaboration
     * Status update on active items     * Status update on active items
 +
 +No update from community
 +
     * Status update on areas of interest     * Status update on areas of interest
 +
 +No update from community
 +
     * Draft Blueprints Discussion     * Draft Blueprints Discussion
       * TBD       * TBD
     * Other cross-project topics     * Other cross-project topics
 +
 +No update from community. Bin will look into details of the projects
  
   * Project Proposal Discussion   * Project Proposal Discussion
     * New Collaborative Development project proposals     * New Collaborative Development project proposals
       * [[project_proposals:​ovrq|Open vRouter Quickstart]]       * [[project_proposals:​ovrq|Open vRouter Quickstart]]
 +
 +Stuart introduced this project to audience. Basically it is a companion of BGS using vRouter in OpenContrail. It is targeted for quick start of OpenStack/​OpenContrail/​KVM/​Docker stack, and quick deployment of system for feature exploration in laptop and lab environment.
 +
 +Bryan (AT&T) said that it is pretty good, and in line with the goal of single node environment. The question is if they are all open source-based. Stuart answered "​yes",​ and indicated that the image will be based on Ubuntu.
 +
 +Bryan also asked that some OpenStack features are missing, such as service function chaining. Stuart replied that essential features are from OpenContrail,​ and part of open source. Service Function Chaining is specifically tied to OpenContrail.
 +
 +Uli (Huawei) asked if the project intends to make it flexible in terms of installers. Stuart clarified that it is really about a quick, single-node environment. It doesn'​t intend to address long-term OPNFV architecture.
 +
 +Ray (Huawei) indicated that it is targeted for a sandbox and separate from release work, so it is not necessarily a single project. Chris (Ericsson) clarified that any project can be incubated without having to participate in any release. So a project doesn'​t have to be part of a release.
 +
 +Through discussion, Stuart will revise the proposal as follows:\\
 +- clarify the tools with details in order not to mislead the expectation (i.e. not to set up high expectation)\\
 +- clarify that it doesn'​t intend to address long-term OPNFV architecture,​ which will be addressed by another project\\
 +- re-categorize it in "​Integration and Testing"​ category.
 +
 +Bin suggested that it is ready for TSC creation review subject to 2-week'​s timeframe.
 +
 +Because of time constraint, meeting adjourned.
 +
       * [[/MidoNet for OPNFV|MidoNet SDN as a Network Provider]]       * [[/MidoNet for OPNFV|MidoNet SDN as a Network Provider]]
       * [[/​LAR-E|LAR-E Framework]]       * [[/​LAR-E|LAR-E Framework]]
wiki/tc_minutes_20150528.1432855927.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2015/05/28 23:32 by Bin Hu