meetings:dt_minutes_20160128
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
meetings:dt_minutes_20160128 [2016/01/30 02:12] hongbo tian created |
meetings:dt_minutes_20160128 [2016/01/30 17:27] (current) Bin Hu |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ==== Minutes of Technical Community Discussion on January 28, 2016 ==== | + | ==== Minutes of DoveTail Discussion on January 29, 2016 ==== |
| - | * ''Date and Time'': 6:00am PST / UTC 14:00, Thursday January 28, 2016 | + | * ''Date and Time'': 6:00am PST / UTC 14:00, Friday January 29, 2016 |
| - | * ''Convener'': Bin Hu (AT&T) | + | * ''Convener'': Hongbo (Huawei) and Bin Hu(AT&T) |
| * ''Participants'': | * ''Participants'': | ||
| - | * Al Morton (AT&T) | + | * Ashok Emani (Intel) |
| - | * Ana Cunha (Ericsson) | + | |
| - | * Arturo Martin de Nicolas (Ericsson) | + | |
| * Brian Smith (Bell Canada) | * Brian Smith (Bell Canada) | ||
| - | * Bryan Sullivan (AT&T) | + | * Christopher Price (Ericsson) |
| - | * Dan Druta (AT&T) | + | |
| * Debra Scott (OPNFV) | * Debra Scott (OPNFV) | ||
| - | * Ildiko Vancsa (Ericsson) | + | * Heather Kirksey (OPNFV) |
| - | * Julien Zhang (ZTE) | + | * Howard (Zhipeng) Huang (Huawei) |
| - | * Larry Lamers (VMWare) | + | * Lincoln Lavoie (UNH) |
| - | * Malla Reddy Sama (DoCoMo) | + | * Mika Rautakumpu (Nokia) |
| - | * Marc Flauw (HPE) | + | * Raymond Paik (OPNFV) |
| - | * Meenakshi Kaushik (Cisco) | + | * Tapio Tallgren (Nokia) |
| - | * Pasi Vaananen (Artesyn)(Stratus) | + | * Tetsuya Nakamura (CableLabs) |
| - | * Ryota Mibu (NEC) | + | * Trevor Cooper (Intel) |
| - | * Tim Irnich (Ericsson) | + | * Xiaoli Wang (Huawei) |
| - | * Ulrich Kleber (Huawei) | + | * Yaoguang Wang (Huawei) |
| - | * Project Proposal Discussion | + | Agenda: |
| - | * Active project proposals | + | * Welcome and Agenda Bashing |
| - | * [[:project_proposals/models| Information Modeling]] | + | * {{:projects:opnfv_plugfest_planning_january-29-2016.pptx|Plugfest Scope and Project Planning}} (Lincoln Lavoie, UNH-IOL) |
| + | * ROE (Ray Paik) | ||
| + | * {{:meetings:plugfest_cablelabs_rules_of_engagement_01-12-2016_v2.pdf|ROE for Plugfest @CableLabs}} | ||
| + | * Some questions and suggestion from test subgroup | ||
| - | Bryan introduced background information from Information Modeling Workshop. Basically:\\ | ||
| - | - Model-driven standards may not be as quick as we expected\\ | ||
| - | - SDOs want to work with us on it, so we need to get the collaboration effort off ground quickly\\ | ||
| - | - We need to establish communication with active participants from SDOs through Jira projects.\\ | ||
| - | - We want to collect standard information models and build a roadmap for analysis and verification\\ | ||
| - | - We plan to work with various OPNFV projects to coordinate on models proposed for testing, and to feedback results to the SDOs\\ | ||
| - | - We need to leverage/develop tools and processes for comparative analysis of standardized models and other de-facto models\\ | ||
| - | - We will coordinate test/demo events focused on publicizing work of the project and enhancing collaboration with upstream SDO / open source project members | ||
| - | Uli (Huawei) asked the question about what is the actual deliverables of this project. Is it information model? | + | === MeetBot Minutes === |
| + | [[http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2016/opnfv-meeting.2016-01-29-14.05.html]] | ||
| - | Bryan answered that the deliverables is the report / analysis / assessment of current information model in industry. | + | === Agreement === |
| - | Uli further asked that it is very important work. But why do we need a project for it? There is no code, and no repo. | + | * **Scope** as outlined on Slide #3 of {{:projects:opnfv_plugfest_planning_january-29-2016.pptx|Plugfest Scope and Project Planning}} |
| + | * Validation of installation process on different hardware platforms and configurations | ||
| + | * Validation of SDN controller integration, coupled with install process testing above. | ||
| + | * (Lower Priority) Verify the life cycle management on the OPNFV platform | ||
| + | * Testing of the application is outside of the scope of this event. | ||
| + | * **Test Suites and all technical work** from OPNFV Dovetail/PlugFest repository | ||
| + | * **Timeline** as outlined on Slide #5 of {{:projects:opnfv_plugfest_planning_january-29-2016.pptx|Plugfest Scope and Project Planning}} | ||
| - | Bryan answered that it is generally good to promote cross-project collaboration, and scope is broader than any single model used by any single project. Furthermore, we will serve as a single point of contact with other SDOs, and we will use more effective communication and collaboration tool, e.g. Jira. | + | === Action Item === |
| - | Ana (Ericsson) asked how do you propose to interface with other project. Bryan indicated that first, we will collect information and assess what has been validated, look at what they are doing and using, and document those areas in report. Second, once gap is identified, we will try to initiate some activity to close the gap. | + | * **Lincoln** to establish PlugFest wiki and draft the scope of PlugFest and high level test plan for group to discuss next time |
| - | + | * **Lincoln** to work with Ray to polish details and finalize ROE | |
| - | Ana further asked if this project can be seen as a customer of test project? Bryan said yes. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Malla (DoCoMo) asked if the effort is to promote some information models or to collect information from SDOs and try to converge. Bryan answered both. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Uli asked once we identify the gap, where to create the model? Bryan answered it is possible to create the model but not #1 priority, because SDOs own it. Our role is more coordination than anything else | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Uli suggested that it would be good to define deliverables more clearly, and we can be more focused on work. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Group agreed that we need more time for community to read and comment on this proposal, and we will come back next week to conclude it. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Meeting adjourned. | + | |
meetings/dt_minutes_20160128.1454119977.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/01/30 02:12 by hongbo tian
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
