User Tools

Site Tools


multisite:bug_bp

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
multisite:bug_bp [2015/09/10 13:24]
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang
multisite:bug_bp [2016/01/27 02:14]
Chaoyi Huang
Line 1: Line 1:
 Use case 1: multisite identity service management: https://​gerrit.opnfv.org/​gerrit/#/​c/​1357/​ Use case 1: multisite identity service management: https://​gerrit.opnfv.org/​gerrit/#/​c/​1357/​
   * Can't specify identity endpoint for token validation among several keystone servers in keystonemiddleware:​ https://​bugs.launchpad.net/​keystone/​+bug/​1488347   * Can't specify identity endpoint for token validation among several keystone servers in keystonemiddleware:​ https://​bugs.launchpad.net/​keystone/​+bug/​1488347
-  * After discussion, community proposed using region-name to specify the keystone server for token validation. https://​review.openstack.org/#/​c/​216579/​. Verification ​in progress.+  * After discussion, community proposed using region-name to specify the keystone server for token validation. https://​review.openstack.org/#/​c/​216579/​. Verification ​done.
  
 Use case 2: VNF high availability across VIM Use case 2: VNF high availability across VIM
   * proposed: Remote port for L2 communicate:​ https://​bugs.launchpad.net/​neutron/​+bug/​1484005   * proposed: Remote port for L2 communicate:​ https://​bugs.launchpad.net/​neutron/​+bug/​1484005
-  * will have dependency on https://​bugs.launchpad.net/​neutron/+bug/1486882, https://​review.openstack.org/#/​c/​215409/​+  * As Neutron PTL proposed, move to L2GW: https://​bugs.launchpad.net/​networking-l2gw/+bug/1529863
  
-Use case 3: VNF Geo-site Redundancy +Use case 3:  ​Multisite ​VNF Geo site disaster recovery 
-  * Nova to expose quiesce / unquiesce API: https://​blueprints.launchpad.net/​nova/​+spec/​expose-quiesce-unquiesce-api +  * Nova to expose quiesce / unquiesce API: https://​blueprints.launchpad.net/​nova/​+spec/​expose-quiesce-unquiesce-api, https://​review.openstack.org/#/​c/​237881/​ 
-  * Save the real ref to volume admin_metadata in Cinder: https://​review.openstack.org/#/​c/​182150/​+  * Get the real ref from volume admin_metadata in Cinder ​Spec: https://​review.openstack.org/#/​c/​182150/  
 +  * Get the real ref from volume admin_metadata in Cinder Code: https://​review.openstack.org/#/​c/​252250/
  
 Use case 4: Centralized service for resources management and/or replication (sync tenant resources like images, ssh-keys, security groups, etc) Use case 4: Centralized service for resources management and/or replication (sync tenant resources like images, ssh-keys, security groups, etc)
-  * Image replication across glance (there is already one BP, but need to work on this BP):  https://​blueprints.launchpad.net/​glance/​+spec/​clone-image-across-regions 
  
 +&
  
 +Use case 5. centralized monitoring service, a user should be able to access all the logs and indicators produced by multiple openstack instances, in a centralized way
 +  * For use case 4&5, new project "​Kingbird"​ proposed : https://​launchpad.net/​kingbird
  
 +  * Both Kingbird and Tricircle (https://​wiki.openstack.org/​wiki/​Tricircle) are candidate solutions for use case 4 & 5.
 +  * Kingbird mainly aimed at fully distributed deployment scenario, Tricircle for centralized management scenario. ​
 +  * Both Kingbird and Tricircle are new projects for multi-site cloud, could be used seperatly or combined together for different scenario.
 +  * .
 Material for review Material for review
 {{https://​wiki.opnfv.org/​_media/​multisite/​multisite_bp-bug_review_0910.pdf|multisite_bp-bug_review_0910.pdf}} {{https://​wiki.opnfv.org/​_media/​multisite/​multisite_bp-bug_review_0910.pdf|multisite_bp-bug_review_0910.pdf}}
multisite/bug_bp.txt · Last modified: 2016/01/27 02:14 by Chaoyi Huang