This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
test_performance [2014/10/09 09:16] Morgan Richomme [Governance and policy (how to manage)] |
— (current) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== Notes F2F Meeting 2/10 ====== | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== Participants ===== | ||
- | * Pranav Mehta, Trevor Cooper (Intel) | ||
- | * Margaret Chiosi (ATT) | ||
- | * Morgan Richomme (Orange) | ||
- | * Wenjing Chu, Michael Tien (Dell) | ||
- | * Palani Chinnakannan (CISCO) | ||
- | * Robert Chen, Deng Hui (China Mobile) | ||
- | * Ashiq Khan (DoCoMo) | ||
- | * Chris Donley, Don Clarke (Cable Labs) | ||
- | * Ajay Sahai (Contextream) | ||
- | * Kin-Yip Liu (Cavium) | ||
- | * Nicolas St. Pierre (Sandvine) | ||
- | * Praveen Kumar | ||
- | * Ulrich Kleber (Huawei) | ||
- | * ? (Centurylink) | ||
- | |||
- | ===== Test Bed Types ===== | ||
- | |||
- | 1) Development (coding) – for continuous integration with regression testing (hosted by Linux Foundation) | ||
- | 2) NFVI/VIM Testbed – a developer “sandbox” -> THIS IS THE TESTBED THAT WE WERE DISCUSSING | ||
- | 3) Specific VNF/PNF (cable, mobile, wireline, etc.) … carrier labs serve this function | ||
- | 4) Vendor interop of VNF/PNFs … may be temporary (e.g. interop fests) | ||
- | |||
- | NFVI/VIM Testbed (from # 2 above) … | ||
- | |||
- | 1) A “sandbox” for developer testing | ||
- | 2) Provides a documented baseline using release candidates of hw/sw ingredients (will keep in sync with OPNFV published reference architectures) | ||
- | 3) Can host multivendor VNFs (i.e. a combination of VNFs represents a use-case that runs on the test-bed) | ||
- | |||
- | ===== Types of testing ===== | ||
- | * Performance of defined use-case | ||
- | * Functionality of defined use-case | ||
- | * Integration testing in order to host a stable baseline for developers | ||
- | |||
- | ===== Project focus ===== | ||
- | |||
- | We identified the following areas to focus on for now and assigned owners to coordinate input and collate a proposal for each … | ||
- | |||
- | ==== Governance and policy (how to manage) ==== | ||
- | * Refer to ODL Open lab page [[https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/CrossProject:Integration_Group:Open_Labs]] | ||
- | * Morgan Richomme (Orange) + Chris Donley (Cable Labs) | ||
- | |||
- | ==== Hw/sw definition ==== | ||
- | * Sw definition will come from the other sub-group (CI process around upstream projects) | ||
- | * Start with one “sku” - additional later | ||
- | * Trevor Cooper (Intel) | ||
- | |||
- | ==== Tooling / IT infrastructure ==== | ||
- | * Require an test-bed user interface to do manual configuration of node interfaces | ||
- | * Test-bed users require remote access to nodes and environment | ||
- | * Wenjing Chu (Dell) | ||
- | |||
- | ==== Use-cases -> test cases (with configurations / test scenarios) ==== | ||
- | * VNF, macro, micro | ||
- | * Test objectives | ||
- | * Palani Chinnakannan (CISCO) | ||
- | |||
- | ==== Other … ==== | ||
- | * We are not talking about a certification or interoperability lab | ||
- | * Purpose is purely for enabling (a community resource) | ||
- | * Need specific policy and guideline for how to deal with proprietary technologies in the test-bed | ||