Wiki

• Date and Time: UTC 14:00, Friday December 12, 2014
• Convenor: Bin Hu (AT&T)
• Participants:
  • Alexandru Vaduva (ENEA)
  • Bryan Sullivan (AT&T)
  • Carlos Goncalves (NEC)
  • Cliff Young (ClearPath)
  • Dave Lenrow (HP)
  • Morgan Richomme (Orange)
  • Parviz Yegani (Juniper)
  • Rajeev Seth (Sonus Networks)
  • Stuart Mackie (Juniper)
  • Ulrich Kleber (Huawei)

• Special Session to Discuss OSCAR Project Proposal

Stuart Mackie from Juniper presented revised OSCAR project proposal.

Dave Lenrow commented that OSCAR overlaps a lot with CI and Bootstrap projects. Dave felt that OSCAR would create another OPNFV inside OPNFV without working with other projects. Dave suggested to figure out how to work inside Octopus to achieve the goal of OSCAR.

Bryan clarified that Octopus doesn't explicitly define installer, deployment tools and VNFs. Octopus wiki doesn't describe it clearly. It might be hidden. If it is hidden, it doesn't exist.

Dave and Uli explained that part of CI is build process, and the other part of CI is deployment process and tools. Dave suggested that it could considered as a sub-group under Octopus to address the need of a specific set of configurations / combinations.

Uli further indicated that we have Bootstrap project to get off the ground and possible different components from upstream projects. We have CI project for build and deployment. We have test projects for test infrastructure, test process and test cases. If we take OSCAR, because it is already a product, how can we evolve OPNFV?

Dave added that the goal of OPNFV and OSCAR are identical. And we don't want another OPNFV inside OPNFV.

Praviz indicated that there is no conflict between CI and OSCAR. BGS is just a sandbox.

<Work in progress and mode to be added soon…>

Meeting adjourned.