This is an old revision of the document!
When:
To join the meeting:
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/900108805
#opnfv-meeting
@ FreenodeAgenda:
JIRA reference:
https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/MOVIE-4
https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/MOVIE-5
Minute:
We talked about the NEMO intent project in ODL, and the proposed language. We found NEMO language is a new style for intent NBI. And very easy to use just like talking with the controller.
1. Reviewed NFV IFA005 Interfaces and actions supported and we will need to MAP Intents to these APIs and compare with OpenStack to see if we are missing any attributes or actions. For we will try map use cases and Intents to conclude drawing use case flows for BOD, VN and SFC. This will take about 4-5 weeks.
2. How is NEMO different from other languages like Frenetic. - http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~jnfoster/papers/frenetic-icfp.pdf - The difference is that NEMO can import any VNF and switch them , chain them together, so NEMO is more focused on Integrating. NEMO is more alike to SQL or a variant of that.
3. How does it compare with Data-log? - Its domain independent where as the NEMO is based on Domains like Network, Compute & Storage. Data-log cannot describe the use cases like BOD, NV, SFC etc.
4. Likely dates for NEMO release with ODL is 12/17/2015 which we can target for one or more use cases as we decide, and ONOS will need more need investigation. This will be ODL release date for compass to take it further into Brahmaputra OPNFV release.
5. Review Akanda's rug (https://github.com/stackforge/akanda-rug) on stackforge for Service VM to apply MOVIE use cases.
6. Discussion about the MOVIE API Specification -Based on support for Intent based on NEMO API in ODL we need to compare the same with ONOS / XoS.
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/NEMO:Main
http://d3s9ug42bq7kbi.cloudfront.net/webinars/onos-dec/ONOS-NorthBound.pdf
-Intent Expression & Compilation -Looks like BOD is still at Network level service and we may have to look at other uses cases to see if they are service level intent. So the BOD scenario is provision based for customer like cost or QoS we can condition it as intent.
Agenda:
JIRA reference:
Define MOVIE API Specification
Implementing MOVIE API in OpenStack using Micro Services by Modules
Minute:
MOVIE had a meeting earlier and decided to provie the 3 use cases of BOD, VN and SFC each with API at two weeks intervals. Also there was discussions to separate Service Abstraction , Service Policy and Intent and call it "Intent Based Policy". The debate was on how it's different from GBP. There was dicussion on Info Model as how Object Node is actually Nodes (type can be host, layer 2 group, layer 3 group, service function pool etc.) and Connection can contain flow. This is to compare how GBP can be built from IBP objects. Plus noted that Flow is contained in Connection objetcs.The native modeling was agreed will be based on Yand Model for both Instances and operations where Action is mandatory, constraints and conditions are optional. The Jira Movie-2 was API creation with there use cases was estaimted toal of 6-weeks so at to complete API work by November 30th. However OPNFV APIs will be implemented by Dec 30th, 2015 for it to be ready in time for OPNFV B Release. The biggest concern was dependence on Liberty completions and start of Miataka November beginning to align with Mitaka M1.
Agenda:
bp: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168539
code: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/195074/
Minute:
Agenda:
Minute:
Agenda:
Minute:
Slides: hares-opnfv-movie-usecases.pdf
Based on the feedback Sue Hares received, for our next meeting. she will write-up the uses cases and indicate what problems these show. Movie members suggested these cases case be presented in write-up and in power-point. In another document, she will summarize and expand on the problems these use cases show.
Agenda:
Minute:
Agenda:
Minute:
Agenda:
Minute: