User Tools

Site Tools


wiki:tc_minutes_20141030

Minutes of Technical Community Discussion on October 30, 2014

  • Date and Time: UTC 14:00, Thursday October 30, 2014
  • Convenor: Bin Hu (AT&T)
  • Participants:
    • Bertrand Souville (NTT DoCoMo)
    • Carlos Goncalves (NEC)
    • Charles Cook (Century Link)
    • Chris Grivas
    • Cliff Young (ClearPath)
    • Dave Neary (Red Hat)
    • Dick Chen (ZTE)
    • Frank Brockners (Cisco)
    • Hiro Maeda
    • Huailin Chen (Array Networks)
    • Jinri Huang (China Mobile)
    • John Browne (Intel)
    • Mario Torrecillas Rodriguez (ARM)
    • Mark Medina
    • Martin Taylor (Metaswitch)
    • Nic Lemieux (Red Hat)
    • Peter Lee (ClearPath)
    • Prakash Ramchandran (Huawei)
    • Ravi Chunduru
    • Ryota Mibu (NEC)
    • Saso Stojanovski (Intel)
    • Serge Manning (Sprint)
    • Sivaprasath Busa
    • Ulrich Kleber (Huawei)

Presented and clarified that it intends to closely collaborate with SR, CI and Test projects, and reuse as much as possible the components and deliverables from those fundamental horizontal projects.

Draft is complete and technical community recommends it for formal TSC review and approval.

Prakash (Huawei) has an action to look into information of IPv6 support in Neutron and other OpenStack components in Paris next week, and report the information back to the community.

Presented and clarified that it intends to deliver the parsing/packaging tool for TOSCA data object model.

Draft is complete and technical community recommends it for formal TSC review and approval.

Presented and clarified that it intends to conduct gap analysis and produce requirements to guide implementation projects. The concern is around the language that makes the scope of the project quite broad. It is suggested to polish the language and narrow the scope to be more focused. It is agreed:

  • Prakash works with author of the project proposal to further polish the language and narrow down the scope
  • Work of the project should start to perform gap analysis in parallel
  • Related implementation projects, if any, should start too in parallel without having to wait for the outcome of gap analysis and requirement guidelines

The target is to get the draft proposal ready for formal TSC review and approval sometime next week.

Presented, and several questions were asked and answered.

Due to time limitation, it is agreed to continue the comment and discussion at mailing list and at teleconference next week. The target is to get the draft proposal ready for formal TSC review and approval after the discussion next week.

Meeting adjourned and all other projects are deferred to discussion next week.

Note: Testbed, SR and CI have their own conference calls to discuss relevant details.

wiki/tc_minutes_20141030.txt · Last modified: 2014/10/31 00:33 by Xing Chen